May be the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?

Puff Bar is a good alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is Puff Bar manufactured with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because you can serve.

Puff Bar

Puff Bar is a relatively new product, that was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that people who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to take with you the small product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.

By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Based on the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows one to put it into your mouth, which means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you might go. If the product also has an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of regulations. The reason being that while there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to utilize to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.

Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. Besides sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco into the marketplace.

And also the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes on the market could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to younger generations, this could substantially decrease the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not supply them with nicotine.

It appears that the UK government could have a point. There is currently no requirement of tobacco companies to add warning labels on the products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have as a common factor is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which in turn implies that fewer people will purchase them.